It is difficult today to find reports on the polarizing Palestinian/Israeli issue unladed of hyperbole; debating the conflict hardly ever occurs without damaging irrational emotional eruptions. It is analogous to navigating a minefield. Facts have been doctored; histories rewritten; irreparable mistakes of strategic heft made by not just the Palestinian and Israeli politicians, but the US and Arab governments as well. In the midst of this whirlpool of arguments and counterarguments, facts and fallacies, through the smoke screen of political folderol, there seems to be a consensus emerging: Palestinian civilians are being exterminated on a daily basis; their children and babies are dying from bombs, diseases, malnutrition, and forced illiteracy; their minds are being stuffed like a thanksgiving turkey with jaundiced ideologies; their despondent fathers are ripe for the picking by radical fringes and political dogmatists.
It would be misleading to think that the United States has always been supportive to Israel’s occupation and hegemony over Palestine. The truth is the U.S. support to the Jewish state had been very cautious until Israel’s victory in 1967. The U.S. involvement in the development of the Arab-Israeli conflict had been very careful in terms of the attitudes and practical steps taken in favor of any state involved in the conflict.
The war of words between Gen. Khaled Nezzar, Former Algerian Defense Minister, and the Former Algerian president Chadli Bendjedid regarding the circumstances surrounding the execution of Colonel Mohamed Chaabani, a hero of the Algerian revolution who led an anti government revolt against the then president Ben Bella, is a rare window into the working of the Algerian government long influenced by the Military establishment. While there are no doubts that Bendjedid was involved in the execution of Col. Chaabani under orders from Benbella, the role of Boumediene in this decision is some what up for debate.
Looking at the historical trajectory of politics in Morocco, it could very easily be argued that the country’s political system was definitely different in the pre-protectorate era than it is now or during the French Protectorate. Even though there were major ethnic and cultural differences in Morocco, the political structure at the time was characterized by many common cultural and social norms. These have certainly favored certain segments of the society over others, but were generally unquestioned and unchallenged by the Moroccan society in its entirety.
South Africa's stint at the UN Security Council (UNSC) was disastrous; and bitterly disappointing to the aspirations of the African continent. In his farewell speech, the South Africa's UN Ambassador registered his regrets for "lack of success in addressing the long-standing conflicts on the agenda". Ambassador Kumalo hopes "the incoming members of the Council will continue the fight on these issues for the sake of the suffering people in those areas and the council's credibility." What a travesty!
From the Green March to the autonomy proposal, Morocco has demonstrated leadership in peaceful endeavors to solve the "Western" Sahara issue. Restraint and diplomacy were Morocco’s strategic choices, I don’t think that we were successful in balancing both and many times the diplomacy side lost flair, many countries decided to recognize the ‘RASD’ because our diplomacy was ill guided in the 80s and 90s, Algeria and the Polisario made grave mistakes too, they ally themselves with the wrong countries, so everyone lost a few diplomatic battles no one lost the war yet and no one should.
the intransigence of the government of Algeria created a circle of confusion that has dominated the Sahara conflict since its onset! The conflict has became a “cancer” in Morocco-Algeria relations! The people of the two countries are a normal extension to each other! People on both sides of the border share the same culture, history, traditions, religion, and together they display every aspect of a homogeneous society! Yet, the gap between the two governments keeps widening! Borders are closed, innocent civilians have been inhumanly thrown out of Algeria, and their belongings have been unjustly confiscated!
Whenever and wherever there is a severe problem, one must not only look for a solution to the issue but more importantly seek to understand the reasons for the situation. Wiping out our troubles with quick and massive fixes will only postpone the eventual re-occurrence of these happenings with bigger consequences. The American adage "the definition of insanity is to do the same thing over and over and to expect different results" comes to mind and seems to perfectly sum up the current situation.
Mostapha Ben Ali was earning $ 60,000.00 per month in Morocco! that is $ 720,000.00 per year. He was the CEO of 2M. In a country where the soldier guarding the nation is still earning $ 200 per month , Mostapha Ben Ali was earning equal to a squadron of 300 soldiers, a regiment of men with enough courage to defend an entire city. One man earning the salaries of 300 brave Moroccan soldiers, this is the extreme injustice a man can accept.
The 19th edition of FIFA Football World Cup finals will take place in South Africa from June 11th to July 11th 2010. The twenty teams competing for Africa’s five spots in the finals have been announced. The format is five groups of four teams each with the winner of each group advancing to South Africa. The latter will be the sixth African representative by virtue of hosting the tournament. This round will start in March 2009 and end in November of the same year. The Moroccan national team, aka Atlas Lions, finds itself in a tough group needing to overcome Cameroon, Togo, and Gabon to qualify.
And who is Mr. Al-Zaidi? A messenger from the Iraqi and the Arab streets who on a daily basis feels the gnawing effect of Bush ‘string of failed initiatives. A man whose hatred for Bush could not be detected by the Iraqi security officials and Secret Service personnel who screened him before entering the press conference. A man who if he had time to reach out and grab the next guy’s shoes to through at Bush, he would have done so. While lobbing his shoes at Bush like a major league baseball pitcher, Al-Zaidi yelled: “This is from the widows, the orphans and those who were killed in Iraq.”
International law is a relatively recent set of regulations, which remain fluid and without verifiable enforcement. It is also known that modern state borders are not a very old tradition, thus making the new definition of state legitimacy a bit problematic in its implications on international law. It is, however, historically recorded that Morocco has had its own way of designing the scope of the state, and with it the reach of its policies and reign.
Washington Mayor Adrien Fenty who is expecting to host up to 4 million people in downtown DC for the inauguration of President-elect Barack Obama has recently celebrated his 36th birthday and a fundraiser with a big party that was held at a large backyard tent with over a thousand people at a sprawling home in the Upscale section of Washington, DC. The mayor welcomed wall-to-wall friends and contributors to his birthday party and his first 2010 re-election fundraiser.
I am not going to hide my personal conviction and my genuine and honest opinion about this issue; I am a big supporter of Morocco’s sovereignty over the Sahara. But I would like to answer this question as we go through this article as unbiased as I can be.
To answer this question we need to go back in time, to a few milestones in the history of this region.
To open or not to open? That is the question swirling around the future of the Algerian- Moroccan borders. Despite appeals from King Mohammed VI of Morocco, several Moroccan civil society groups, and IMF Director General Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the Algerian authorities have refused to open the borders with its neighbor to the west. Granted the borders were closed by Morocco in 1994, the situation surrounding the closure has been resolved and Morocco has a new leadership in place that look at this situation under different light. So, why is Morocco so persistent on opening the borders while Algerian officials are set against it?
The silence of the Arab regimes in the face of the barbaric Israeli attack on thousands of civilians in Gaza is a disgrace at best and a war crime at worst. Israel does what is good for Israelis, but I am not sure if Arab leaders do what is best for Arabs. But then, what can you expect from a bunch of unelected self-serving leaders? Once again the Palestinian people are paying a high price for the incompetence, indifference and impotence of some Arab and Palestinian leaders.
On Saturday December 27th, Israel launched relentless attacks on Gaza by means of air strikes with the goal of “dealing” with Hamas. Civilian casualties are on the rise and attacks are on day three while it is unclear what the next few days will bring. The use of force will backfire on Israel as it does a great disservice to efforts aiming at resolving the conflict peacefully. Its consequences are far overreaching.Israel’s use of force and its relative indiscriminate attacks that are causing large numbers of civilian casualties will only strengthen Hamas.
The current Moroccan constitution guarantees freedom of religion for all, but it designates Islam as the state religion. Missionary work is not allowed, but there are foreign missionaries in other roles seeking to spread their faith. Conversion from Islam is not a criminal offense in Morocco but new converts face social ostracism. Any criticism of Islam is banned under the Penal Code and is punishable with up to five years in prison. Publications that could "threaten the fundamental institutional policies or religion of the kingdom" can also be banned.
To qualify Mr. Belkhadem , The Algerian Minister of State and General Secretary of the FLN party, statement : "the Algerian people reached an agreement with one of the biggest colonial powers (France), and we accepted to hold self-determination referendum, then how could we oppose to such a solution for another people" of tasteless and insulting, is indeed, an understatement. The Algerian minister disrespect of the memories of millions of brave Algerian, Tunisian and Moroccan patriots who died fighting the French occupation in North Africa is a disgrace.
A mistrusted bicameral parliament is in place in Morocco and its members are supposedly elected every four years. The king is considered, according to the Moroccan constitution, the supreme political authority, head of the state, and religious authority (Amir Al Mouminin -Commander of the Faithful). He heads the army, and has the power to declare war and sign peace agreements. He also appoints the prime minister and other prominent people who serve in the government. Historically speaking, Morocco is considered to be one of the oldest states of the world, especially because of its existence and presence in international affairs as a political body for more than twelve centuries now.
The "Assembly of Dormants" is the nickname used by Moroccans to refer to their Parliament (Chamber of Representatives). Since its establishment, the Moroccan Parliament and Parliamentarians have been the targets of jokes and sarcasm reflecting a wide cynicism of the average Moroccan toward an institution that is supposed to be at the heart of the fragile Moroccan "democratic" system. At the core of this popular attitude are two major factors, one is a flawed electoral system and the other is a pathetic political party landscape.
Three to four million people are estimated to converge in Washington, D.C. on January 20th, 2009 to witness the momentous inauguration of Barak Hussein Obama as the 44th US president. Inauguration tickets, which are provided to members of the Senate and House of Representatives for free, are being snatched like hot dogs at a Nathan’s international July Fourth eating contest. Entertainment and sports event brokers are selling them for thousands of dollars. The swearing-in will last less than five minutes; people are willing to make their way on foot through closed-off roads and blocked bridges, around security barricades, in temperatures forecasted in the 30’s Fahrenheit, and stand for hours around the National Mall platform, west of the capitol to hear the words: I Barack Hussein Obama Do Solemnly Swear…
The humanitarian conditions of the civilian population in the "Western Sahara" refugee Camps in Tindouf Algeria are so dire, that making an immediate international humanitarian intervention necessary, according to international humanitarian organizations and to Sahrawis who were lucky to escape the Polisario-Algerian run encampments. In 1976 and on behest of the Algerian military, the Polisario separatist movement lured thousands of Sahrawi nomads from their native lands in what was then called Spanish Sahara, Mauritania, Algeria and Mali to Tindouf, a Town in western Algeria, where it continues to confine most of them against their will.
President-elect Barack Obama’s aides say that he is considering to make a major foreign policy speech from an Islamic capital during his first 100 days in office. Here is why It should be Morocco : What do you call an Arab, Amazigh, Muslim and African country who was the first to recognize the United State of America's independence? Kingdom Of Morocco What do you call a moderate, tolerant and peaceful country who is the strongest ally to the United States in the region? Kingdom Of Morocco. What do you call Obama's first foreign policy speech overseas in Morocco after his inauguration? A historical moment.
Located at the foot of the High Atlas Mountains, Aît Abbas is a tiny rural village in a province that counts just 11,000 inhabitants. Here, there is neither electricity nor running water, and life is harsh, the only distractions being a small café and a weekly market - when the road isn’t blocked with snow. Most of the villagers here are non-existent in the eyes of the state: dozens of men and women without identity papers or family record books, and hundreds of children born without birth certificates.
Two students have succumbed to their injuries on Monday, Dec 2nd, in Agadir, Morocco, while a third is under observation in hospital after being crushed by a bus. The victims were among a group of students that have taken over the Agadir bus terminal and demanded transportation to their city that same evening. Having failed to obtain satisfaction, the students set up a barricade in front of the bus station and tried to take over a bus by clinging to the windshield, as the driver maneuvered the bus out of the station, the bus hit a wall and crashed the students. Three students were seriously wounded and taken to a local hospital where two of them died of their injuries later in the evening.
Getting the full picture of any news story requires looking at the issue itself from different perspectives. With this said, it seems as if Al Jazeera TV is either not aware of this very simple idea or simply ignores that it applies to it too. I am saying this because I have spent the last 5 months watching the infamous news outlet trying to see what it is that makes it either so loved or so hated. Here, as a Moroccan, I talk about it from my own biased perspective. This bias, however, is at least based on a few items of evidence that can be easily checked.