Print

Political Reform And The US-Moroccan Strategic Discussion

Sarah Wade
US_Morocco_Dialogue.pngWhile most attention was focused on the Friends of Syria meeting held in Marrakech this week, US officials also held meetings with the Moroccan government and should keep in mind that political reform will ultimately be essential to stability there. Deputy Secretary of State William Burns  attended the Syria meeting on December 12, in place of Secretary Clinton whose illness

prompted her cancellation, and he used the opportunity to meet with officials for strategic talks building on the US-Morocco Strategic Dialogue launched on September 13.

Secretary Clinton and King Mohammed VI were scheduled to meet in order to discuss the Mali and Syria crises, humanitarian concerns, and bilaterial ties in business and economics, including initiatives resulting from the recent US-Morocco Business Development Conference held in Washington.  This agenda reveals a stark reality: attention to needed political reform is eclipsed by economic and security considerations in the US-Moroccan relationship.

Although President Obama said in May 2011 that “it will be the policy of the United States to promote reform across the region, and to support transitions to democracy,” this is not in fact the policy of his administration when it comes to countries that have not experienced massive popular uprisings. Although Morocco did not experience a regime change, it is no stranger to the social, political, and economic pressures that toppled its neighbors, and has experienced protests demanding transparent and accountable political institutions developed through a democratic process. Morocco’s partnership with the United States might indeed improve regional security in countering the threat of al-Qaeda and grow its domestic economy, but without responsive political institutions in place, improvements in these areas will not be sustainable.
When the Arab awakening protests came to Morocco in February 2011, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton commended King Mohammed VI for his response, as he promised reforms instead of launching a violent crackdown. “In many ways, the United States looks to Morocco to be a leader and a model,” Clinton said. The opening meeting of the strategic dialogue three months ago marked the signing of a memorandum of understanding, stating the commitment of Morocco and the United States to the “…principles and purposes of the Charter of the United Nations, to human rights and to the ideals of peace, justice and democracy…”
Secretary Clinton underscored the continued support of the United States in Moroccan efforts to translate Morocco’s political reform commitments into actions in her opening remarks at the first session of the dialogue. Yet despite this hopeful rhetoric, thus far there is no action plan to operationalize this intention on the Moroccan side, nor has the United States frankly acknowledged the ongoing human rights abuses, rampant corruption, lack of transparency, and lack of credible political life in the country.
The official narrative of the Moroccan Arab awakening is that the king placated the protestors’ demands for democracy by graciously initiating historic constitutional reforms. The king’s constitutional reforms do not significantly alter, however, the power structure of the political system.  Although the prime minister is now selected from the largest party in parliament, the King retains most of the real decision-making authority; he has the power to appoint and dismiss government ministers, the right to dissolve parliament, and can influence legislation by power of decree.
Meanwhile, violations of personal freedoms and rights continue, for example infringements on the freedom of speech. Reporters Without Borders recently voiced concerns about the increasing number of violations against freedom of speech and information in Morocco, which is ranked 138 out of 179 countries in their World Press Freedom Index. Recently, a journalist’s credentials were revoked by the Moroccan state because the journalist portrayed the monarchy’s role in elections in what the government deemed an unprofessional manner. Despite the pro-rights orientation of the 2011 constitution, there are still many legal tools used to suppress freedom of expression. For example, Article 41 of the Press Code mandates five year prison terms for speech that “undermines the Islamic religion, the monarchical regime, or [Morocco's] territorial integrity,” or that is offensive toward “His Majesty the King, and the royal princes and princesses. ” Violations do not stop at limitations upon free speech; the Moroccan justice minister conceded in September that there have been cases of abuse at recent protests. Some protestors, affiliated with the opposition February 20 Movement, testified that they had been tortured and beaten by police while in detention.
Despite these troubling conditions, there is little pressure from the United States for Morocco to engage in substantive reforms and improve protection for freedoms. The section of the US-Morocco memorandum of understanding discussing political dialogue is encapsulated within the security section, and there is no discussion of political reforms or democratization. At the first session, the agenda of the political working group devoted only fifteen minutes to discussion of the reform agenda in Morocco, including the promotion of political reform, development and stability; ten minutes for the discussion of government transparency; and an additional ten minutes for the discussion of human rights.
The Moroccan monarchy currently has some time to undertake reforms that might blunt the edge of future dissent. A recent Gallup poll shows that in countries like Morocco, where major revolts did not take place, citizens believe that countries that experienced revolution in the region are less safe, have worse economic prospects, and weaker governance. But it would be wrong to become complacent about stability in Morocco, as the country suffers from many of the same ills—youth unemployment, corruption, lack of accountable government—as did Tunisia and other countries that had uprisings. The Moroccan case is an opportunity for the United States to put its rhetoric into practice and try once more to promote evolutionary rather than revolutionary change.

Sarah Wade is an intern at the Rafik Hariri Center for the Middle East at the Atlantic Council.
Article previously published by Atlantic Council

Add comment

While Morocco News Board encourages discussion on all subjects, including sensitive ones, the comments posted are solely the views of those submitting them. MoroccoBoard.com does not necessarily endorse or agree with the ideas, views, or opinions voiced in these comments. This is a moderated forum. Comments deemed abusive, offensive, or those containing profanity may not be published. Please Read Site's Terms of Use

To post Video, images and links please use appropriate button

Comments (10)  

 
Morcelli
+4 #1 RE: Political Reform And The US-Moroccan Strategic Discussion?Morcelli 2012-12-14 11:58
Sara Wade is a young smart intelligent intern

www.acus.org/users/sarah-wade

and anyone who tries to paint a pretty picture of what's going on in Morocco should read her article.

She is very much up to date on events taking place in Morocco.

Here is what the makhzen has been doing lately

reuters.com/.../...


Before you comment on this article don't make a fool out of yourself and start making excuses for the evil and the puppet

Very well say:

"Yet despite this hopeful rhetoric, thus far there is no action plan to operationalize this intention on the Moroccan side, nor has the United States frankly acknowledged the ongoing human rights abuses, rampant corruption, lack of transparency, and lack of credible political life in the country.."

Let's also keep in mind that the US said the same thing about the elections that took place in Algeria and the compliments that Bouteflika has received from the Secretary.

As I said time and again, the US looks for the interest of US and Israel only, if that takes looking the other way on rampant injustice and abuses, so be it. Obama is actually one of the worst presidents when it comes to looking the other way. Didn't take him for ever to drop Moubarak?
If Moubarak did not start killing his own people, he would be still in power thanks to Obama.
Quote | Report
 
 
riffi
+3 #2 RE: Political Reform And The US-Moroccan Strategic Discussion?riffi 2012-12-15 00:12
No comment,it has been all said let's implement the action plan and stop talking
Quote | Report
 
 
WAH WAH
-3 #3 RE: Political Reform And The US-Moroccan Strategic Discussion?WAH WAH 2012-12-15 21:48
THE KING MOMO6 IS THE RICHEST GUY ON THE PLANET

lakome.com/.../...
Quote | Report
 
 
riffi
+2 #4 RE: Political Reform And The US-Moroccan Strategic Discussionriffi 2012-12-16 01:28
Bad news for Morocco John Kerry has been nominated for the position of secretary of state, he is a pro polizbel guy,he always voted and supported the polizbel in the Senate.the makhzen has to be ready for a rough ride.
Quote | Report
 
 
morcelli
+5 #5 RE: Political Reform And The US-Moroccan Strategic Discussionmorcelli 2012-12-16 13:37
Riffi,
It does not work that way. US foreign policies never depends on one individual. John Kerry may sympathize with the polisario due to his close relationship with the Kennedys and the RFK center for Human rights, still, this will not change an iota of how the US views Morocco. Morocco is and has been a staunch ally of the US and perhaps the only country that the US can rely on.

When you deal the US, you do not deal with one person, you deal with set of rules that define their foreign policies and this is the reason that those who sympathize with Morocco only speak up when they are out of office.
Here is an example:

reuters.com/.../...

US policy is to keep a balance in North Africa between Algeria and Morocco no matter how beneficial we are the US. The US is not about to lose lucrative business with Algeria to please Morocco and the same hold true for Morocco. The US will only go that far for Israel, when Obama tried to have Susan Rice as his new secretary, he clearly mentioned in her defense that she will continue to work hard for the security of Israel. I am confident that he will not go that far for the security of Morocco.

The only way to solve the problem between Morocco and Algeria is if the Algerian people rid themselves of Bouteflika and co, replace them with people who are forward looking and who do not hold grudges of the past. otherwise, I assure you that you and I will not live to see peace between the two countries and that is sad.

The resolution of the conflict will not be achieved without Algeria, the government of Morocco is very much aware of this fact.
Quote | Report
 
 
Jamal Boudinmok
-5 #6 Baby+Steps = Forward²+Moveme nt³Jamal Boudinmok 2012-12-16 17:47
Many on Moroccoboard are hell bent on igniting fire whether. And in the case of Morocco they sight lack of progress as a reason for their dismay. Political or Economical or sometimes Religious or Social.. What these kids from Moroccoboard conveniently ignore is that slow progress as it maybe is still progress. True Morocco is not an advanced Economy, but I'll fight to protect Morocco while it moves forward at baby step pace, anytime, against anybody. So learn to like Morocco's Democracy you Algerian Generals loving traitors, we're going to protect our homeland and support its slow progress for as long as it takes. Don't wanna be like Backward Algeria EVER.. Infested by Terrorist collaborators and manipulators.. makes me sick.
Quote | Report
 
 
riffi
+4 #7 RE: Political Reform And The US-Moroccan Strategic Discussionriffi 2012-12-16 23:34
Morcelli agree with you but the man can always stall the process in backing up the Moroccan autonomy.
Quote | Report
 
 
ouldabbas
-2 #8 Play ob the music.ouldabbas 2012-12-17 01:26
The sahara affair was settled when Morocco sent its troops and when the Algerians did not. The Algerians were not confident that their army could fight far away from its bases. This happened in 75 and in 79.

The rest is what I call dancing with the Rosses, the Rajoys, the Hollands, the Obamas, the Sarkozys, and the Kerrys.

If Algeria wants access to the Atlantic ocean, they will have to come an get it
the hard way. Boutflika's battallions as Boumedienne called them will not be enough.

Till they come, let us continue the dance. I guess after Ross it is Kerry. We love dancing. We definitely prefer it to fighting bunch of paid mercenaries.

Play on the Music! Sahara music. Kerry is commmmming. Ross is leavvvvvving. Play on the music! It is Sahara Music.
Quote | Report
 
 
Weld Leblad
-4 #9 Lesson One and TwoWeld Leblad 2012-12-17 06:58
Lesson one for Sarah Wade: Get down from your high horse, i.e., political science papers written from thousands of miles away, and see the real change on the ground, the real debate happening in Morocco with no dogma, which ruins the outlook of so many so-called "independent" commentators.

Lesson two for Sarah Wade: Show some humilty and get some real opinions, not from the noisy chattering mob, but from those honest Moroccan folk with no hidden agenda except the advancement of the Moroccan cause and society. Then and only then will the likes of me take your articles on Morocco seriously.

What's more, only the blind and the fool are obssessed about the cup half empty. I prefer to focus on the cup half full.

Democracy is on the march in Morocco. And we do not need to copy any monarchical model in Europe. They have their history and we have ours longer than theirs.

Plus there is no shame in finding one's own path to fully-fledged democracy at one's own pace through negotation and compromise. That's how the main political actors prefer to do business. No to confrontation. Yes to dialogue.

What's more, fast food-style democracy does not exist. It is a slow and long process to perfection.

Ask the proud subjects, not citizens (Mr Morcelli), of the oldest continuing democracy in the world, Britain, and they will tell you that they are not satisfied with the current state of affairs. Scots want their independence. The Welsh want more power to their assemby. And some in Northern Ireland want to reunite their land with the Republic. As to the English, they want to get rid of the House of Lords which is full of unelected members. Yes, you heard right. Unelected members do still pass laws in the oldest democracy in the world.

That's how democracy works, it evolves step by step and season by season. Some times people decide to jump and most of the time change comes at a slower pace thus avoiding any unnecessary turmoil.

Personally, I am satisfied with the current constition. When the time to change it comes, we will have another debate.
Quote | Report
 
 
Al Bargui DeMouck
0 #10 Negative means PositiveAl Bargui DeMouck 2012-12-22 21:50
If your comment has higher negative, it's because you're saying what they can't argue against. Their admission they lost this debate. Increase your negative rating, is the way to go then.. Looking at how the GOPers act against Democracy in the USA, I'm sure glad for Morocco they have a better Democracy with MVI at the helm. Keep them Fundamentalists out of power.. Just look at what the Christian Fundamentalists did to the US Economy and foreign policy. Sub-prime disasters, AIG bailed out, the unemployment rate like never before, the IRAQ & Afghan Wars. All the product of the Republican Fundamentalist Party. Christian Fundamentalists & Muslim Fundamentalists are two sides of the same COIN. Bankeruptcy is what they know how to produce. Don't trust enemies of Moroccan Democracy, means, don't trust the GOP either.
Quote | Report
 

Contributors

 

Copyright © 2007 - 2012 Morocco News Board, The News Source for Moroccan Affairs. | Washington, DC | Email: info@moroccoboard.com | Phone: (703) 623-8421 | MoroccoBoard News Service | All Rights Reserved.

porno izle sikis sex shop sisme bebek