Watch MoroccoBoard TV
Biased Article From New York Times E-mail
ZAK ETTAMYMY

Cara Buckly wrote an article in the New York Times regarding the Sahara issue.  it always intrigues me to read articles about the Sahara when written by someone like Cara Buckly, she worked for the Miami herald, Miramax and other media outlets, she is now a New Times columnist.

she usually writes about local news and events but she likes to venture away very seldom, actually I looked for past articles written on subjects beyond the city borders; I only found the Sahara article; this put her knowledge and ability to write an accurate article in question and doubt for me. I read the article and it is not all bad for someone who normally writes on socio-economic life in the big apple, her adventure was not too catastrophic, a little misleading but not all bad.

She talked about the fact that the Sahara is a “colony”, that the Sahrawis are "kind of free under the Polisario" she definitely found excuses for the flagrant human rights abuses in Tindouf, and she also mentioned that High Commissioner for Refugees said they did not know of any refugees who had been prevented from leaving the camps, an information to be verified. The negative rhetoric continued about the Moroccan position, her mentioning that Eric Goldstein, a research director for the Middle East and North Africa division of Human Rights Watch, said “Morocco had encouraged non-Sahrawis to settle in Western Sahara, because of what Morocco views as their historic ties to the land. Sahrawis now form a minority there”. After reading this article carefully, I got the sense that Cara was protecting herself from any personal involvement in this half way around the world conflict; she only reported what others said to her. One may say: what is the

problem with that? Well the problem is that, as she was trying to seem neutral and non bias in this unknown conflict to her and to many Americans, she tipped toward the other party without even knowing it. The negative points she talked about, mentioned above, were all statements made by people with different point of view than that of Morocco, she reported that with sincerity and faithfulness. but when it came to the positive points, remember her objective was to seem neutral there had to be some positive points for Morocco, she immediately dismissed them on the spot, I 'll explain: she talked about a Sahrawi who returned to Morocco and spoke about the atrocities and violations in the camp:“The Polisario people to us just look like the Mafia people,” said Said Abderahman, 28, who said he left a camp with his pregnant wife, Salma Essalek, 25, last fall in what both described as a treacherous escape. “The international agencies are giving plenty of
food, and the local population is not getting it.”
Another Sahrawi refugee, Brahim al-Selem, 34, said he was a policeman in the camps but had to pay a smuggler last August to flee after being imprisoned for speaking out against the Polisario Front.
But then immediately she followed his statement with:  "Mouloud Said, who represents the Polisario Front in Washington, went further, denouncing the refugees’ statements as hyperbole and contending that they were being used for political purposes by Morocco.
“These people are brought by the Moroccan public relations companies here, so they have to mislead,” he said."
After reading this article, it made no sense to me, Cara was trying to write her way out of a conflict she ought not to touch again, she should have talked to the Moroccan side to look balanced and non bias but the way she conducted her "research" was one sided and not worthy of getting published on a credible newspaper such as the New York Times. But then we bare some responsibility too, our officials should be ready to counter attack these erroneous claims; their job is to face the media head on with strength and confidence. Many similar articles are written everyday without a Moroccan point view expressed on them, many radio and TV shows are on the broadcast without the Moroccan voice defending the territorial integrity of Morocco.
But then again every Moroccan is a soldier defending Morocco on his and her own terms.
Zak Ettamymy

Comments
Add New Search RSS
you lack freedom to get my nam  - Sale Goat   |2008-11-07 13:13:16
what happened to Sahara? is this that spot south of Morocco with a bunch of sand, fought about since 1975?

why don't you split the sand and finish the problem? I do remember when I was kid, at Moulay Driss school in Fez. we had that day of almasseera and those buses come and take us kids, to wave to the king Hassan II. we had less than 10 yards to flee when we got out from the school were forced into the buses.

I was a genius, I made it out on time and run away. my teachers were threatening to get me later, but I just run away to the garden cross the street.

shoot! you made me remember some terrorism that I lived thru. next monday, you were suspended from school for running away, not cheering the king... that was a real mission, much harder than Arnold vs predator mission.

if anyone read this, please let's me know who are you? and what kind of Moroccan groups you belong to?? I'm lost in this world and I'm visiting my native people after along time...
Hmimarmad   |2008-10-14 09:54:10
Below is from the magazine Telquel. I hope that Morocco sticks to objecting this Christopher Ross. How can someone who worked in Algeria for so long be favorable to Morocco?
As we all know, we have a history to succumb to outside pressure and Algeria never succumb to any pressure. That's the sad truth. I hope that we do it right this time and build on whats been accomplished so far ( Serious and Credible). If we agree to someone who is friendly to the Algerian theses, then we will have to do start all over again. if Peter van Walsum said, the independence is impossible, then we need someone who can confirmj ust that, not someone who will drive us back.
I really hope that we learned from the past.
Btw, is there a way of making our voices heard? Is there someone/somewhere in the Moroccan Government where we can tell them what we think? or we will simply watch for another 33 years?
Good Day!

Sahara. Le Maroc se fait désirer

Le secrétaire général des Nations Unies peine à remplacer Peter Van Walsum après la récente “démission” de son représentant personnel au Sahara. “Les consultations avec les deux parties concernées pourraient prendre encore plus de temps”, a déclaré Ban Ki-Moon lors d’un point de presse tenu récemment à New York. La raison de ce retard : Rabat n’est pas favorable à la nomination de l’Américain Christopher Ross. “Il (Christopher Ross) a été en poste en Algérie de nombreuses années. Le Maroc craint que cela joue en sa défaveur”, croit savoir cet observateur. De son côté, le Polisario fait moins la fine bouche. Le ministre sahraoui des Affaires étrangères, Mohamed Ould Salek, a déclaré à la presse avoir accepté la proposition de Ban Ki-Moon.
Hmimarmad   |2008-10-12 16:07:08
Dear Zak,
Here is an article from the same author dated June 4, 2008 and I do not see anything biased or unbiased toward Morocco or the Polisario. She is simply stating facts, better yet, she took the time to showcase the Polisario refugee that fled the camps and are now living in Morocco and working for Morocco.

Please read:
http://www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/wsahara/2008/0604limbo.htm


I want to be clear that our opponents are the Algerian military regime NOT the Algerian people. I have met several Algerians and I can say that they are GREAT people and they are as we say rajjala. When I am hanging out with my Algerian buddies, I feel as if I am with my Moroccan ones, I really do not feel any difference between us. As a matter of fact, they do feel the same way about us as they call us lamarrouk. They want the borders to open, they want us to go visit and they want us to be one two nations and one people.

On the same Note:
Algeria is yet again doing everything possible to complicate the task of Morocco.
Morocco needs to find the secret formula to get the Algerian Generals to embrace the Autonomy plan. The price of oil is going down and that's good news, less money the Algerian military has, the fastest a solution can be found.

http://www.reliefweb.int/rw/rwb.nsf/db900SID/KKAA-7KB6AC?OpenDocument

Good Day!
Said again   |2008-10-10 11:23:01
zak and Hmimarmad both of you make good sense, although I am more on zak's side because he did not write an article similar to le matin garbage, he wrote about an article that offended him personally and us all.
we need to encourage people like him who speak when everyone else is not speaking but I also like hmimarmad analysis because it is true that we need to approach USA more and let things happen around us.
one more time i agree with zak that our politicians need to do more to defend our country.
thanks both
Houssine Yassin  - New York Time Article   |2008-10-10 09:02:32
Let's start a petition to make the NYT hear our voice. Or let's start responding to Cara's article. Morocco point of view has to be at least heard
Hmimarmad   |2008-10-10 09:03:44
Dear Zak,
I appreciate your continuous interest in the never ending Sahara problem. I too am very interested in this subject that I think can be solved if we (Morocco) could identify the root of the conflict.
I am sorry to tell you that any time I read any of what you write, you sound exactly like our dear brothers and sisters from \\\" Le matin Du sahara\\\".
This is not the first time nor the last time that we will run across articles that are biased. As a matter of fact the articles that are biased toward Polisario outnumber the ones that are biased toward Morocco.
Most of what was written about the conflict states that no country on earth recognizes the Moroccan sovereignty over the Sahara but every other articles states that the sahraouis need to be given the opportunity to determine their own future. The problem here is that the Polisario propaganda is much better organized and people naturally tend to sympathize with the side that lives in camps.
Dear Zak, I would suggest that when you write about the Sahara, think about the other audience, the one that you have mentioned above, the ignorant.
We Moroccans know that our main problem is Algeria. Until Algeria \'s President Bouteflika decides to turn the tide, we have no choice but to rely on the US to come to our rescue. As much as I hate to say this, Georges Bush has been the best president for Morocco. He is the only president who sided with Morocco. All others simply play the neutral game.
It is our responsibility to continue what Bush has started. The only country on earth that can get the Algerians to change the rules of the game, is the US. The US defends and support Israel no matter what, Morocco should thrive on securing the good side the US. We have supported the US in every possible way and it is only natural that we expect the same. For instance, Algeria is against the AFRICOM, Morocco should bring AFRICOM and fast. We need to be proactive and not just wait for things to happen because they will not unless we get up and do something about it. for instance, lets not celebrate when Malawi recognize and unrecognized the Sahara FOUR times.
Got to go to work, Good Day!
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 

3.26 Copyright (C) 2008 Compojoom.com / Copyright (C) 2007 Alain Georgette / Copyright (C) 2006 Frantisek Hliva. All rights reserved."

 

Morocco Board, Alexandria, Virginia
Email: info@moroccoboard.com | Phone: (703) 623-8421

Copyright © 2008 Morocco Board All Rights Reserved.
 
Emergency Alert: Take Action to End Israeli Attacks on Gaza'Let Gaza Live' Jan. 10 National March on Washington
Raising the Flag Over City Hall
Watch MoroccoBoard TV

Who's Online

We have 584 guests online